history channel documentary 2015 Creation Research Society Quarterly, December, 1973, p.174 says, "The devastation and the loss of comets puts an unmistakable maximum breaking point on the age of the nearby planetary group. Rather than 4,5 billion years, it shows up at the most to be just a couple to a few thousand years of age." Before they sent men to the moon, NASA was worried around one of the alleged "verifications" the evolutionists use for their "4,6 billion year old universe." These evolutionists accepted (and obviously demanded educating our researchers and understudies) that the dust on the moon was "a few miles" profound in view of the disintegration of the moon surface "over billions of years" because of the ultra-violet light and X-beams from the sun. They said that this dust had been aggregating at a rate of 2 to 5 thousandth of an inch for each year. As indicated by them, there were presently hazardous floats of delicate dust amassed all around on the moon's surface.
Isaac Asimov trusted that the dust could be "many feet profound" and in spots "50 feet profound or more." The accompanying words scared the men at NASA when he said, "I get a photo, in this way, of the main space ship, choosing a decent level spot for landing purposes, coming gradually descending tail-first and sinking gloriously outside of anyone's ability to see" (Asimov's own exposition - 1958).
In the Monthly Notice of the Royal Astronomical Society of London, V115, pp 585-644, Lyttleton (an evolutionist) talks about the X-beams and UV light striking the uncovered moon rocks. He trusted that they "could amid the age of the moon (which he clearly accepted to be "millions" of years old) be adequate to frame a layer over it a few miles profound."
No comments:
Post a Comment